Changing the syntax evidence by the grammarians

Abstract

 Syntax evidence is one of the most important basic on which the early Grammarians relied in documentation and arguments , and as a guide they were able to codify the rules, set standards and Root The Origins. The evidence in syntax is the evidence of judgment, the basis of the rule and the spirit of the law and the standard, but the one who meditates on grammar books sees that the grammarians tell some of these evidence in different, even contradictory narratives; to conform to their rules and standards, which called some narrators to accuse the grammarians of confusion and inaccuracy, and even fraud and deliberately change those evidence. This research highlights this phenomenon in a scientific objective way, and tries to find out its causes and effects, and how common and influential it is in the differences between grammarians.