إشكالية الحسن والقبح بين العقل والنقل

Abstract

    The issue of improvement and ugliness has occupied many intellectuals, scholars and jurists from the earliest ages to the present day, as it is rarely agreed that a researcher in the humanities without referring to it, because of its relation to the science of speech and ethics, jurisprudence and its origins, and the scholars of speech take good ness and ugliness as the basis for his judiciary The problem is that they are good and ugly, as they improve the good and ugly, and the one who is mentally good and ugly does not impose on God a mandate, but is inferred through his attributes, and the fact that Islamic law is the final and final conclusion and the judgments in it are fixed, Any legitimate rule that derives its rule from sharia is permanent, so hassan is hassan after all and the ugly is ugly.

    We cannot deny that the mind is a detector of goodness and ugliness, because man was born broken that Hassan Hassan and ugliness are ugliness, and most jurists say that the mind realizes the good and the ugliness of deeds, and this realization does not necessarily require the consent of Islam, there are many differences and opinions in Hassan. And the ugliness in that they are realistic things that do not differ and do not change by science or ignorance, will and choice and not, or are they from the mind and differ in faces and considerations, so beating the orphan to discipline him is good and beating him unjustly ugliness, or these two The two things are due to the command and prohibition, and what Allah almighty has ordered is good and what he has forbidden is ugly, because they are subjective and it is difficult to understand the mind for them.

     The reason may improve or actually, when God is ugly, and he is ugly, and god is good, and the mind realizes that faith is good as well as justice, and recognizes disbelief is ugly as well as injustice, but the realization of this good or ugly is because of the connection of reason to religion.