Assessing Knowledge, Public Awareness, and Confidence Assurance of Apheresis Donors among Blood Bank Donors in Tobruk, Libya

Abstract

Background: Blood donation is a critical component of healthcare, and apheresis has emerged as an advanced technique for collecting specific blood components, such as platelets, plasma, and red blood cells. Despite its advantages, apheresis remains less well-known to the general public than whole blood donation. This study aimed to compare apheresis donors with whole blood donors in Tobruk, Libya, to assess their knowledge, public awareness, and confidence in the procedure. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 36 blood donors in Tobruk, Libya, focusing on demographics, trust, concerns, and procedure understanding. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to compare apheresis and whole blood donors, while logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing donor confidence and willingness to donate via apheresis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study revealed that male donors are more likely to donate apheresis than female donors, with younger donors being more likely p < 0.05). Apheresis donors are generally more educated, with 50% having higher education compared to 40% of whole blood donors. Confidence in the apheresis device is higher among apheresis donors (80%). Concerns about infection and health safety are more common among whole-blood donors(30%). Conclusions: The study revealed that male donors are more likely to donate apheresis than females, with younger donors being more motivated. Apheresis donors have higher confidence in the device, but 15% report concerns about infection and health safety.