Role of Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Lumbar Disc Degenerative Disease.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64516/aepr9m65Keywords:
Degenerative disc disease,, Magnetic Resonance Imaging,, Low back pain.Abstract
Lower back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease is a condition that affects young to middle-aged persons with peak incidence at approximately 40 y. MRI is the standard imaging modality for detecting disc pathology due to its advantage of lack of radiation, multiplanar imaging capability, excellent spinal soft-tissue contrast and precise localization of intervertebral discs changes .This study is aimed to evaluate the characterization, extent, and changes associated with the degenerative lumbar disc disease by Magnetic Resonance Imaging .A total 109 patients of the lumbar disc degeneration with age group between 17 to 76 y were diagnosed & studied on 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging machine. MRI findings like lumbar lordosis, Schmorl’s nodes, decreased disc height, disc herniation, disc bulge, disc protrusion and disc extrusion were observed. Narrowing of the spinal canal, lateral recess and neural foramen with compression of nerve roots observed Ligamentumflavum thickening and facetalarthropathy was observed. This study showed that males were more commonly affected in Degenerative Spinal Disease & most of the patients show loss of lumbar lordosis. Decreased disc height was common at L5-S1 level. More than one disc involvement was seen per person. L4 – L5 disc was the most commonly involved. Annular disc tear, disc herniation, disc extrusion, narrowing of spinal canal, narrowing of lateral recess, compression of neural foramen, ligamentumflavum thickening and facetalarthropathy was common at the L4 –L5 disc level. Disc bulge was common at L4 – L5 & L5 – S1 disc level. L1- L2 disc involvement and spondylolisthesis are less common. Lumbar disc degeneration is the most common cause of low back pain. Plain radiograph can be helpful in visualizing gross anatomic changes in the intervertebral disc. But, MRI is the standard imaging modality for detecting disc pathology due to its advantage of lack of radiation, multiplanar imaging capability, excellent spinal soft-tissue contrast and precise localization of intervertebral discs changes.
References
1. Neuropathy-sciatic nerve. (2013). sciatic nerve dysfunction; low back pain- sciatica internet. Bethesda (MD): A.D.A.M. Inc. [cited 2012 Aug 12]. Availablefrom: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/ PMH0001706/.
2. Bakhsh A. (2010). Long-term outcome of lumbar disc surgery an experience from Pakistan. J Neurosurgeon Spine.;12:66.
3. Modic MT, Ross JS. (2007). Lumbar degenerative disc disease. Radiology; 245: 43-61.
4. Battie MC, Vide man T, Gibbons LE, Fisher LD, Manninen H, Gill K. (1995).Volvo Award in clinical sciences: determinants of lumbar disc degeneration—a study relating lifetime exposures and magnetic resonance imaging findings in identical twins. Spine ;20: 2601–12.
5. ShafaqS, Hafiz MA, Muhammad AKR, AishaR, Arsalan AA, Junaid A. (2003). Lumbar Disc Degenerative Disease Disc Degeneration Symptoms and Magnetic Resonance Image Findings. Asian Spine J.;7(4):322–34.
6. Haughton V. (2006). Imaging intervertebral disc degeneration. J Bone Joint SurgAm;88 (Suppl 2):15-20
7. Takatalo J, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Taimela S, Näyhä S, Järvelin MR, et al. (2009) Prevalence of degenerative imaging findings in lumbar magnetic resonance imagingamong young adults. Spine;34(16):1716-21
8. Shambrook J, McNee P, Harris EC, et al. (2011). Clinical presentation of low back pain and association with risk factors according to findings on magnetic resonance imaging Pain;152:1659–65
9. Park JB, Chang H, Lee JK. Quantitative analysis of transforming growth factor-beta
10.1Pa 1976). 2001;26:E492–95in ligamentumflavum of lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation. Spine (Phila
11.etiology. Radiology. 2010;257:318-20 ( 10) Wang YX, Griffith JF. Effect of menopause on lumbar disc degeneration: potential
12.Cheung KM, Karppinen J, Chan D, Ho DW, Song YQ, Sham P, et al. Prevalence and
13.pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one
14.thousand forty-three individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(9):934-40
15.Lipson SJ, Muir H. Experimental intervertebral disc degeneration: morphologic.
16.proteoglycan changes over time. Arthritis Rheum. 1981;24:12–21)
Takatalo J, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Taimela S, Näyhä S, Järvelin MR, etal 13)
17.Prevalence of degenerative imaging findings in lumbar magnetic resonance imaging
18.among young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(16):1716-21
19.Shambrook J, McNee P, Harris EC, et al. Clinical presentation of low backpain.
20.association with risk factors according to findings on magnetic resonance
imagingPain. 2011;152:1659–65